The marriage laws have been warped into a disadvantageous and dangerous endeavor for any man to take on these days – and there’s a strong opinion online that men should stay away from marriage because of the inequality and ability to be “raped” in divorce court, lose any and all custody and visitation rights to their children etc. However, is this really the reason not to marry? Bare with me.
Let’s take out, hypothetically, that the laws are skewed towards women in divorce courts. Once we have removed it, what do we have left, the bare bones of whether we would marry or not. I know the easy answer you think will be is of course yes. But is it really?
Are any of you guys out there really that stoked to get married in the first place, that removing this major obstacle is going to fulfill some childhood dream where you fantasized about seeing your bride walk down that aisle while you waited for her? Would you instantly swoop up any chick just to lock her down because it’s now safe too? Or would you look at the market place with the same view as you did with the overt biased divorce laws still in existence?
Take away the threat of losing half or most of your shit, the overwhelming desire to not marry should still be the fact that their isn’t an abundance of marriageable chicks, even in a perfect lawful state. When you interact with chick after chick, and crazy experience after another, would you just want to jump in with some chick just to say you were married? Hell let’s put in some incentive in there, say you’d get an extra 50 thousand bucks to get married, would you still find a lot of girls you’d be happy to spend the rest of your life with? I doubt it.
In many ways I still don’t see the argument of divorce laws being the reason you don’t get married. If you actually find a good one, that is actually a feminine, wholesome, empathetic girl, then the laws don’t matter as long as you have game at your disposal and keep her interested in the marriage, and the laws don’t matter in selecting a wife if you take into account these things in a mate. The choice shouldn’t be about not getting married at all, it should be is there any chicks left that are worthy of marriage. And that is the crux of game. Is any girl worthy of riding my dick, or getting me to commit.
The roles have reversed in the sexual market place, we’re no longer the hunters anymore, we’re the one’s who need to act aloof, indifferent and uninterested – we’re the one’s that need to run game to build attraction, we’re the ones that are being sought for commitments, be he alpha for her deepest desires, or beta for her security blanket. We’re the commodity now, not them. Yes girls on the surface are more in demand, they always will be, because of biology, but in terms of how you get chicks, the roles have reversed. A girl who plays hard to get now is not doing herself any service if she wants a servicing, and a man playing easy to get only looks desperate.
With the removal of slut shaming, girls now have no risk (outside their physical safety) in the dating world. Since no one’s allowed to judge them anymore, and men judged like we’re in the Spanish inquisition, men have more to risk in any dating interaction, with things like false rape, harassment, etc. should the girl not find you attractive and you miscalculate gaming her, or send her one too many texts or emails, or online messages. You’re balls are ultimately in women’s hands with every interaction. Of course it’s alpha to not care about any of that and just plow through it, because that in itself is dangerous nowadays.
So, with the state and society behind them, datable and marriageable girls have become like unicorns – most of us think they’re just a made up fantasy from someone. But if you found a unicorn, would you marry her?