Why do so called critics of mine think I’m doing something wrong by teaching both sexes how they can be happy? What is it about people these days who can’t get past a simple microcosmic issue and fail to grasp the larger macro issue as a whole? We see this on all levels of humanity now, for example, mention words like abortion and rape, no matter the context, and a large segment that hears these words will only hear these words and not the actual context, and certainly not a bigger picture, not a larger scope of thinking.
This way of thinking has shown itself to be saturated in every level of society, from the masses to politicians, corporate leaders, even scientists – we are all part of a singular matrix, unable to pry ourselves from the machine as it marches on and tramples everything in its path. We no longer understand symbols – they used to be reminders of something we believed in – once we saluted the ideals and morals of our country when we saluted the flag, now we salute the flag because if we don’t we’re not patriotic.
Learning game, at least for me, is not about tricking girls to sleep with me, or brainwash these helpless beings into going along with my world view, it’s about giving both sexes what it takes to make each other happy – masculine males and feminine females, it’s the balance that most people crave despite their modern in-ability to separate issues about basic human rights and gender actualities.
Is this a systematic dumbing down of society? Is it a tragic symptom of a society on information overload – constant marketing and appeals to each cause out there – splintered into sub groups and issues? When did we allow the hijacking of our mutual happiness? Since when is women’s issues not men’s issues and vice versa? How are the issues affecting men, false rape, hyper gamy, divorce inequality, marginalizing , misandry, not the issues that affect women? They surely do, or else we wouldn’t see women rejecting beta males and wondering where all the real men went, that this separating of gender issues created.
More importantly how do you reach out to an audience that isn’t there? The greatest tragedy is having the wise men painted as lunatics, or worse, as invalid. And what about an audience? It seems these days, as an entertainer, or teacher, you have to find one and fit into that audience rather than them finding you. Kids these things didn’t used to be so, not before the dark times.
When feminism was created, it reflected on our society, a culture of duality began, opposition, in order for females to gain rights it had to reject the female and embrace the male, on the inside, and on the outside vice versa – this in turn had an effect on men, (anyone that could think past a grade 10 education should have been able to ascertain this) and in the end has caused such a chasm that one wonders if it could ever be bridged again or if it will just get wider. Will we ever see past 2 feet in front of us ever again?